The giant electric cars that were banned after the sinking of the Felicity Ace have been banned

recently drowned Felicity Ice The auto carrier is already impacting the broader freight industry. Car carriers are beginning to implement policies that restrict or completely ban electric vehicles due to concerns about the fire hazards posed by batteries, reports splash.

Japan’s Mitsui OSK Lines (MOL) suffered greatly earlier this year when its vessel, the Felicity Ice He was lost in a fire that broke out while crossing the Atlantic Ocean. About 4,000 cars were lost, with the statement including the latest Lamborghini Aventadors and Honda Prelude. The accident caused the company to incur losses of $500 million, according to a law firm Vinson and Elkins. With the ship sinking, it is likely that the cause of the fire remains unknown, but it is suspected that the electric vehicles on board contributed to the ferocity of the fire.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Labor said splash They have now implemented a new policy that prohibits the transportation of used electric vehicles at the present time. The policy concerns only all-electric vehicles, while still allowing hybrid vehicles to be carried on board. The spokesperson said, “The number of used electric vehicles we are transporting has been increasing recently,” adding that the company “has decided to suspend accepting the booking of used battery electric vehicles for the time being,”

As standard practice, MOL regularly checks ICE vehicles prior to transportation for obvious issues such as fuel or oil leaks that could pose a fire hazard. The spokesperson noted that it is currently difficult to do this with used electric vehicles. In particular, the Ministry of Labor confirmed that Stuff.co.nz That politics “has nothing to do with the accident Felicity Ace.Instead, the spokesperson noted, it occurred due to a policy review that was prompted by the increasing number of used electric vehicles the company was receiving for transportation.

Other carriers are still happy to move electric vehicles, whether new or used. As I mentioned Profile personlyToyofuji Shiping NZ and Armacup Maritime Services have indicated that they will continue to ship electric vehicles as normal following MOL’s announcement of its new policy. “It is business as usual,” says Hans Corporal, chief operating officer of Armacup, adding that “our policy is not to accept electric vehicles that have been damaged by accidents, but we will closely monitor developments regarding used electric vehicles and may need to adjust our policy in the future when more become available.” of information”.

Interestingly, studies have found that electric vehicles are less likely to catch fire than cars and hybrids powered by internal combustion engines. Thus, the policy of the Ministry of Labor may seem unusual in this respect. However, in the event of a fire, electric vehicle batteries burn more fiercely, are more difficult to extinguish, and can also spontaneously re-ignite days after they are extinguished. Thus, the danger posed by electric vehicles is understandable, and perhaps the exception to hybrids makes sense given the smaller batteries such vehicles typically carry.

If the new MOL policy is due to the risk of runaway combustion during an external fire, rather than the risk of EVs themselves igniting, banning used EVs alone is meaningless. New electric vehicles present the same amount of fire risk in this respect. However, MOL may not want to jeopardize relations with the major automakers by banning the shipment of its latest products. Thus, banning a subset of electric vehicles helps reduce the risk of a fairly rapid fire.

For its part, the International Maritime Organization has determined that firefighting standards need to change to better deal with the challenges electric vehicles pose to transport carriers. With hundreds or thousands of cars parked close to decks, firefighting techniques used on land, such as submerging a vehicle in a water tank, are simply not practical on ships.